Five months after fabricated educational references pressured South Africa to withdraw its draft nationwide synthetic intelligence (AI) policy, one of many two officers suspended over the scandal has resigned. Disciplinary proceedings towards the opposite communications division staffer are nonetheless beneath means.
Solly Malatsi, South Africa’s communications minister, says the federal government stays assured that Cabinet will finalise the substitute AI policy earlier than the top of March 2027, with public session anticipated to start in April.
But the unfinished disciplinary course of leaves questions on accountability for a scandal that embarrassed a authorities in search of to place South Africa as a continental chief in AI governance.
Malatsi instructed TechCabal in an interview on Thursday that the division couldn’t permit the incident to move with out penalties, acknowledging the harm brought on by AI-generated materials use that went undetected in the course of the AI policy’s preparation.
“Having such a major stain on an important policy is something that cannot just be allowed to slide,” he stated.
The minister confirmed that the division suspended two officers for failing to disclose AI use in getting ready materials that contributed to fabricated references showing within the policy.
“The appropriate processes were followed, and two officials were suspended,” Malatsi stated. “The ongoing processes now relate to the one official who remains an employee of the department.”
In May, TechCabal reported that South Africa withdrew its draft AI policy after fictitious educational references had been found. The setback triggered renewed scrutiny over how generative AI is utilized in policymaking and uncovered weaknesses in authorities oversight.
Malatsi stated the division’s director-general acted after he instructed that these accountable be held accountable.
“It was clear that there had been non-disclosure around the use of AI, which contributed to the hallucinations that emerged in the policy,” he stated.
The minister described the withdrawal as crucial regardless of the harm it brought about to the federal government’s policymaking course of.
At CollectiveXchange 2026, a nationwide digital expertise and jobs summit, in Johannesburg earlier on Thursday, Malatsi acknowledged that the method had skilled a “false start.” He careworn that the federal government was working to full its inside processes earlier than opening the substitute policy to public session.
“Yes, it is very late, and that is the consequence of having a false start,” he instructed delegates.
However, Malatsi rejected the suggestion within the interview with TechCabal that the federal government had launched a brand new deadline for the AI policy. He stated the January 2027 reference and the top of the 2026/27 monetary 12 months weren’t separate dates, whereas reiterating his confidence that the policy would be finalised by the top of March.
The timetable locations duty on the independent AI review panel team led by Professor Benjamin Rosman of the Machine Intelligence and Neural Discovery Institute on the University of the Witwatersrand to restore confidence within the policy after the unique draft’s credibility collapsed.
Malatsi stated the panel had been working at tempo and that he remained assured it will ship a draft Cabinet might finalise. When the AI policy enters public session, he stated, authorities departments would have made inputs, adopted by engagement with civil society, residents, the non-public sector and different stakeholders.
The substitute policy will want to tackle greater than the failures uncovered by the quotation scandal. Despite the fabricated citations, Malatsi stated the withdrawn draft contained credible provisions, together with protections for South Africans’ rights and dignity on-line.
“As unfortunate as the withdrawal of the policy was, it was necessary given the stain that it had,” he said. “Much of the policy’s substance was credible, and everyone who has engaged with it has acknowledged that.”
The minister additionally pointed to the necessity for safeguards governing the moral use of AI, together with avenues for redress when the expertise is used improperly.
“The important thing for us is to ensure that when we create a regime for the ethical use and ethical adoption of AI, where the use is not ethical, there’s got to be an avenue for recourse,” he stated.
True scale calls for transferring past surface-level integrations to sturdy execution. We’ve filtered the noise out of Moonshot 2026, optimising the convention strictly for high-calibre connections between startup founders, international monetary operators, enterprise leaders and people rewiring Africa’s technical frameworks. Get 20% off Early Bird tickets for a limited time.
