By Taiye Agbaje
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday reserved judgment in a go well with in search of to void the emergence of former Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, as All Progressives Congress (APC)’s candidate for the Yobe North Senatorial District.
Justice Salim Ibrahim, in a ruling, mentioned the judgment date can be communicated to events 24 hours earlier than supply.
The decide made this identified after legal professionals to the events adopted their processes and offered their arguments for and towards the case.
When the case was known as, Francis Mgboh, who appeared for the plaintiff, Hassan Kafayos, adopted all their processes and urged the courtroom to grant their reliefs.
Citing a earlier Supreme Court choice, Mgboh argued that the apex courtroom made it clear that problems with candidate nomination in an election are problems with constitutional provisions.
The lawyer submitted that Lawan was by no means a candidate within the May 18 APC major.
Mgboh, who harassed that the election was mounted for May 18 and never May 20, mentioned Lawan by no means purchased a nomination kind for the senatorial place.
“He is actually not suppose to be on the list,” he mentioned.
Besides, the lawyer argued that the election was performed via a repealed Act.
He, due to this fact, held that there was no election that produced Lawan as senatorial candidate.
He prayed the courtroom to declare Kafayos as a validly nominated candidate for the ballot.
Adedayo Adedeji, SAN, who appeared for APC, and Shaibu Aruwa, SAN, who represented Lawan, disagreed with Mgboh’s submission.
Adedeji, in his argument mentioned a preliminary objection was filed to problem the jurisdiction of the courtroom to listen to the go well with.
The senior lawyer adopted his processes and prayed the courtroom to dismiss Kafayos’ go well with with a considerable value.
He described the go well with as an abuse of courtroom course of, arguing that the go well with ought nkt yo be filed by the plaintiff.
“The court has no jurisdiction because the suit is statute barred, having been filed outside the time frame prescribed by the constitution,” he mentioned.
He noticed that the first was held in May whereas the go well with was filed lengthy after the time.
Adedeji additionally urged the courtroom to discountenance with the doc through which questions for cross examination of subpoenaed witnesses have been compiled, describing it as incompetent.
Abdulalim Akeem, who appered for the APC National Chairman, Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda, additionally urged the courtroom to dismiss the go well with, whil Aruwa sought a N100 million value towards Kafayos.
On his half, P. A. Bello, lawyer to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), aligned himself with the arguments Adedeji and Aruwa.
Bello argued that the case lacked benefit and ought to not have been filed within the first occasion.
He urged the courtroom to dismiss the go well with with substantial value.
After listening to the events, Justice Ibrahim reserved judgment to a date to be communicated to the legal professionals.
Kafayos, within the originating summons filed by Mgboh, had sued APC, Prof. Yilwatda; Lawan and INEC as 1st to 4th defendants respectively.
The plaintiff, an aggrieved aspirant within the May 18 Yobe North Senatorial District major election, prayed the courtroom to void the emergence of Lawan, the previous Senate President, as occasion’s candidate for the 2027 ballot.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reviews that Kafayos, within the go well with, sought 4 reliefs.
He sought a declaration that the deliberate exclusion or suppression of his lawful participation, a monetary member of APC, as aspirant within the May 18 senatorial election by the first and 2nd defendants with none cheap trigger, breached his proper of freedom from discrimination.
He mentioned that is assured by Section 42 of the 1999 Constitution.
He mentioned the defendants’ motion breached Sections 84, 85, 86 and 87 of the Electoral Act, 2026 and in addition violated the occasion’s tips as supplied for in Articles 2, 9.3 and 20 of the APC’s structure to not undermine democratic procedures or precept within the inside affairs of the occasion.
The claimant, due to this fact, sought an order of injunction restraining APC and Yilwatda from forwarding Lawan’s identify to INEC as consensus candidate of the occasion to have been lawfully nominated as candidate for Yobe North Senatorial District.
He additionally sought an order restraining INEC from accepting or publishing Lawan’s identify “over the flawed primary election of the 1st defendant for Yobe North Senatorial District primary election that took place on May 18 .”
He equally sought an order, compelling the first, 2nd and 4th defendants to conduct a recent major election for the senatorial district or to recognise him because the duly nominated candidate of the occasion within the major elecause.
Kafayos additional prayed the courtroom for an order directing APC, Yilwatda and Lawan to collectively and severally pay him the sum of N50 million as aggravated and exemplary damages for his wrongful exclusion as aspirant within the ballot opposite to statutory provision, Electoral Act, 2026 and the occasion’s structure.
Kafayos, within the affidavit he deposed to, mentioned as a monetary member of APC vying to signify his folks within the 2027 election as senator, he duly indicated his curiosity by procuring the occasion’s Expression of Interest (EoI) Form.
He mentioned upon completion of the shape, identical was duly returned and acknowledged by the occasion on May 6.
He mentioned subsequently the occasion organised a screening train for all supposed aspirant that had efficiently submitted their EoI Forms.
He mentioned he was efficiently cleared by the APC’s Screening Committee as one of many aspirants for the first election scheduled for May 18.
According to him, on May 18, after ready for a lot of hours, the election committee of the first defendant appeared on the Yobe North Senatorial District major election venue at Government lodge Gashua Yobe at about 3.25pm and with none prior discover or negotiation to announce that solely the third defendant had been cleared.
He alleged that they knowledgeable him that he had been disqualified from the election opposite to his constitutional proper and the supply of the Electoral legal guidelines and regulation set out by INEC.
He mentioned the unprecedented state of affairs prompted severe pandemonium among the many voters who have been fed up with Lawan representing them within the Senate.
He mentioned the voters began chanting his nickname, “Iroko” “Iroko” “Iroko” as their candidate for Senate.
He alleged that members of the electoral committee, with the assist of Lawan, used some officers and males of the Nigeria Police Force to fireplace teargas on the venue of the first election to disperse the gang of voters gathered for the direct major election at Gashua, Yobe.
He mentioned he knew there was no direct major or consensus election performed on the designated venue at Gashua, Yobe May 18, since all voters have been dispersed by the Nigeria Police Force teargas.
He alleged that he later noticed on social media that the committee had left the impartial venue floor at authorities’s lodge, Gashua scheduled for the election and moved to Lawan’s non-public residence at Gashua in Yobe the place about seven individuals affirmed Lawan as APC’s candidate for the senatorial district.
He mentioned this was on the detriment of the occasion’s inside democratic procedures and compliance with the electoral tips of INEC.
He mentioned images of Lawan’s affirmation by both six or seven individuals at his non-public residence in Gashua on May 18 have been copied from his Redmi A5 handset and printed from his HP Laser-Jet P-2015 printer and hooked up as Exhibits “G”.
The aspirant mentioned he exhausted all efforts by him to hunt inside administrative process to register his grievances to the occasion via its state’s Chairman Appeal Committee, Damaturu in Yobe by submitting his criticism in writing dated May 18.
Kafayos mentioned it will be within the curiosity of justice to put aside the flawed ballot to permit a recent election on account of absence of transparency and breach of inside democratic course of.
Alternatively, the aggrieved aspirant prayed that INEC ought to disqualify Lawan and declare him the candidate duly elected for the senatorial district.
But Lawan, APC and Yilwatda urged the courtroom to dismiss the go well with of their separate processes.
Lawan in his preliminary objection, challenged the jurisdiction of the courtroom to listen to the go well with, urging the courtroom to dismiss it for need of jurisdiction.
The APC additionally corroborated Aruwa’s argument in a preliminary objection filed by Adedeji, SAN.
Adedeji prayed the courtroom to dismiss the go well with for being essentially faulty and for vesting no jurisdiction on the courtroom.
Adedeji equally argued that the go well with is statute-barred because it was filed outdoors the obligatory 14-day interval prescribed by Section 285(14) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Rule 9 of the Practice Directions, 2022.
Yilwatda, in his counter affidavit deposed to by Lovelyn Donatus, a authorized officer within the Legal Services Department of APC, averred that the occasion duly constituted the Primary Election Committee that performed the Senatorial ballot.(NAN)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
