With only a few weeks to the 2027 common elections, the political ambiance is already heating up, characterised by campaigns, political alignments, defections and different election-related actions. Politicians are jostling for public consideration, events are consolidating their constructions, and candidates are making guarantees of their quest to safe the mandate of the voters. However, beneath the rising political pleasure lies a extra basic query: Is the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) adequately ready to conduct credible elections?
There is little doubt that Nigerians are more and more bored with the same old electoral marketing campaign rhetoric, exaggerated guarantees and political theatrics that usually disappear instantly after elections. The voters has heard sufficient guarantees of financial transformation, employment alternatives, improved safety and higher infrastructure. What Nigerians need now could be a transparent demonstration of how candidates intend to translate their guarantees into tangible outcomes. They are now not desirous about infinite name-calling, private assaults and political mudslinging. Rather, they need issue-based campaigns that may allow them to evaluate candidates on their competence, character, observe data and coverage proposals, regardless of their political affiliations.
While the standard of political campaigns stays essential, the preparedness and credibility of INEC must be of even higher concern. An election is simply as credible because the establishment liable for conducting it. Unfortunately, latest developments surrounding the electoral fee have continued to lift critical questions on its readiness. The controversies surrounding the removing and reinstatement of party-nominated candidates, suspicious inside redeployments of electoral officers and the invention of AI-generated photographs within the voters’ register are developments that do little to encourage public confidence within the fee.
Of explicit concern is the revelation by INEC’s Head of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) final week that some electoral officers had been concerned within the unlawful inclusion of AI-generated photographs within the voters’ register. This is a critical breach that raises basic questions in regards to the integrity of the registration course of and the reliability of the fee’s database. More disturbing, nevertheless, is the obvious absence of publicly introduced disciplinary measures or prosecutions towards these accountable. How can INEC guarantee Nigerians of a reputable election when officers entrusted with defending the integrity of the electoral course of can allegedly compromise it with out seen penalties? The fee should transfer past public disclosures and exhibit accountability by way of decisive motion.
Equally troubling is the controversy surrounding the publication of candidates’ lists. The repeated back-and-forth over which candidates have been recognised, eliminated or reinstated creates pointless confusion and undermines confidence within the electoral course of. Nigerians deserve certainty in regards to the candidates taking part within the elections, not a state of affairs the place INEC seems to make repeated U-turns on revealed lists. While reliable authorized disputes and courtroom orders have to be revered, the fee should exhibit consistency, transparency and professionalism in dealing with such issues. Electoral info must be clear, well timed and accessible to all stakeholders.
Another crucial space that calls for pressing consideration is the recruitment and profiling of advert hoc electoral personnel. INEC should be sure that each particular person engaged within the electoral course of, significantly Presiding Officers and Returning Officers, undergoes thorough background checks and correct verification. The controversies that trailed the 2023 common elections, together with allegations of the involvement of people falsely offered as college lecturers within the manipulation of ends in some states, ought to function an enduring lesson. The fee can not afford to repeat such embarrassing experiences. Verified identification tags, correctly authenticated credentials and clear recruitment procedures have to be obligatory for all advert hoc personnel to forestall impersonation, infiltration and electoral malpractice.
Furthermore, INEC should urgently undertake a complete cleansing and verification of the nationwide voters’ register forward of its ultimate show in December. The credibility of an election begins with an correct voters’ register. Duplicate entries, fictitious identities, questionable pictures and different irregularities have to be recognized and addressed earlier than the register is finalised. The fee must also make the method clear sufficient to permit political events, civil society organisations and extraordinary Nigerians to establish and report suspicious entries. A compromised voters’ register creates room for electoral manipulation and casts doubt on the legitimacy of the eventual consequence.
Ultimately, the duty of conducting free, honest, credible and acceptable elections rests closely on INEC. The fee should perceive that public confidence will not be secured by way of press statements, assurances or repeated appeals for Nigerians to belief its processes. It is earned by way of transparency, accountability, consistency and demonstrable professionalism. The unanswered questions surrounding its latest actions have to be addressed earlier than Nigerians go to the polls. The fee should additionally strengthen its operational capability, shield the independence of its officers and be sure that each stage of the electoral course of is open to scrutiny.
As Nigeria approaches one other defining second in its democratic journey, INEC should recognise that the 2027 common elections are larger than the ambitions of particular person politicians or the fortunes of political events. They symbolize the collective hopes and expectations of hundreds of thousands of Nigerians who need a authorities that actually displays their selections. Nigerians will not be asking for an election that favours any political get together or candidate; they’re demanding an electoral course of that protects their votes and offers legitimacy to whoever emerges victorious. INEC should subsequently reply the questions being raised, restore public confidence and exhibit, by way of its actions, that it is able to ship elections that will likely be free, honest, credible and acceptable to all.
Tochukwu Jimo Obi, Obosi, Anambra State
