The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed an amended go well with filed by Intels Nigeria Limited in search of to restrain the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from investigating an alleged $74 million debt owed to the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) by the corporate.
Justice Emeka Nwite dismissed the case on October 2, 2026, in accordance to court docket paperwork completely reviewed by Nairametrics.
Intels had, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/164/2022, dragged the EFCC, its chairman, the NPA, and the Attorney General of the Federation (the primary to fourth defendants) earlier than the court docket.
Among its reliefs, the corporate sought an order restraining the EFCC and its operatives from additional demanding the sum of $74 million from the plaintiff.
The quantity was allegedly due to the NPA as fee underneath the Managing Agency Agreement between Intels and the NPA, first entered into in 1998 and renewed in 2003, 2011, and 2018.
Intels’ authorized workforce urged the court docket to maintain that the continual invitation, arrest, and interrogation of its officers over “purely civil matters relating to, connected with and arising from the agency agreements between the Plaintiff and the NPA” amounted to illegal harassment, intimidation, and misuse of the EFCC’s statutory powers.
Intels claimed that in interrogations in April 2021, EFCC operatives allegedly tried to interpret contractual provisions unilaterally with out offering a duplicate of any petition, rejected its ongoing account reconciliation course of, and asserted that their very own calculations confirmed a $74 million deficit.
NPA’s objection to the go well with
In its preliminary objection filed in July 2025, the NPA urged the court docket to strike out the go well with.
The NPA argued that Intels was difficult the powers of the EFCC and whether or not its actions amounted to illegal intimidation and misuse of statutory powers.
It additional argued that no allegation of wrongdoing had been made in opposition to the NPA and that there was no cheap explanation for motion in opposition to it.
EFCC’s place on the investigation
The EFCC, then again, maintained that the grievance (petition) forwarded to it by the NPA disclosed issues requiring legal investigation.
The fee informed the court docket that the “NPA complained of the non-remittance of the sum of USD148,152,572.42 as at 2017 and further alleged that certain third-party payers had been directed to make payments into the account of Intels West Africa Ltd UK with Standard Chartered Bank rather than into the account contemplated by the contractual arrangements.”
The EFCC’s proof additional confirmed that one Mr Kalu Uche was invited by the fee and made an announcement throughout its investigation.
The EFCC additionally cited allegations regarding transactions and funds amounting to a considerably bigger determine, stated to be as a lot as $1,247,947,083.
Court’s reasoning for dismissing Intels’ go well with
In his judgment, Justice Nwite held that the existence of a contractual relationship between events doesn’t, by itself, decide whether or not an allegation arising from transactions underneath that relationship is civil or legal in nature.
He additionally confused {that a} contractual transaction could present the background to an allegation of legal diversion or conversion.
- “Conversely, the fact that a contractual relationship exists cannot confer upon a law enforcement agency a power to determine the parties’ contractual rights or to adjudicate upon the disputed amount,” he said.
- The decide confirmed that Intels and the NPA had a contractual relationship, including, “They plainly did.”
Nwite highlighted that though the EFCC’s statutory powers have limits, the existence of an arbitration clause within the events’ settlement doesn’t represent a whole bar to a real legal investigation.
- “An arbitration clause regulates the resolution of contractual disputes between the parties; it does not confer immunity upon transactions from investigation where there is credible material suggesting that a criminal offence may have been committed,” the decide said.
- On the totality of the proof, the decide stated he was glad that the grievance that led to the EFCC investigation had a factual foundation arising from allegations of diversion and conversion, which have been sufficiently distinct from the mere existence of a debt.
- Nwite confused that it will be incorrect to characterise the EFCC’s complete intervention within the case as a purely civil debt restoration train.
The decide additionally said that nothing in his choice must be understood as conferring on the EFCC the authority to lastly decide the contractual accounts of Intels and the NPA or to deprive the events of any contractual or judicial cures accessible to them.
He held that the contractual relationship remained ruled by the agreements between the events and the relevant dispute-resolution mechanisms, whereas any investigation may proceed solely inside the scope of the statutory powers conferred on the investigating company and in relation to issues correctly falling inside these powers.
In the circumstances, the decide stated he was unable to discover that Intels had established grounds for the broad declarations and injunctive orders it sought in opposition to the defendants.
According to the decide, the proof earlier than the court docket didn’t justify declaring the EFCC’s investigation illegal merely as a result of the transactions underneath investigation arose from a contractual relationship or as a result of the events have been concurrently engaged in reconciling their accounts.
He defined that granting the plaintiff’s reliefs of their broad kind would have the impact of stopping the investigation of transactions merely as a result of they arose underneath contracts containing dispute-resolution provisions.
He added that this may transcend defending Intel’s contractual rights and would, in impact, confer immunity on the transactions from lawful investigation.
- “The evidence does not warrant such an order,” Nwite said.
He subsequently refused to grant Intels’ reliefs and dismissed the go well with.
INTELS’ dispute with the NPA
INTELS Nigeria Limited is a agency engaged in built-in logistics providers for the Nigerian oil and gasoline business.
Nairametrics recollects that in October 2017, the Federal Government ordered the NPA to cancel its boat pilotage monitoring and supervision contract with INTELS over an alleged breach of contract.
- The NPA alleged that INTELS had failed to remit boat pilotage income amounting to roughly $207.646 million, alongside different revenues.
- INTELS denied the allegations on the time, arguing that the NPA was the get together indebted to it.
In 2023, former Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar additionally countered claims that he still owned a stake in INTELS, saying he had offered his curiosity in 2020 for $100 million.
